State Responsibility and the Indus Waters Treaty Following the Pahalgam Attack: A Case Study India vs Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63306/x1t09t37Keywords:
Indus Waters Treaty, Transnational Terrorism, International Law, Hybrid LawAbstract
This article aims to analyze the legal basis for state responsibility under the International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism and the Rome Statute. It also evaluates the role of the Indus Waters Treaty as a crucial legal instrument between the involved states. Employing a qualitative single-case study approach, the research utilizes primary data from UN treaties, the Rome Statute, official reports, and global news, supplemented by secondary data from academic journals and research institutions. The analysis is conducted using normative legal analysis, content analysis, and comparative analysis. The findings indicate that Pakistan’s logistic and financial support meets the criteria for both a breach of international law and a causal link to the attack. The study shows that the Indus Waters Treaty can be invoked as a basis for a reparation claim, although the dispute resolution mechanism is hampered by geopolitical pressures. Furthermore, a significant regulatory gap exists for addressing hybrid terrorism. This article concludes by emphasizing the need for a hybrid legal framework that integrates treaty law and customary norms. It recommends amending anti-terrorism conventions, enhancing the verification of hydrological data, and strengthening mutual legal assistance to prevent similar incidents.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, A., Singh, S. C., & Das, K. N. (2025). Exclusive: India starts work on hydro projects after suspending treaty with Pakistan, sources say. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/india-starts-work-hydro-projects-after-suspending-treaty-with-pakistan-sources-2025-05-05
Anggraini, D. D. (2024). Pengaturan Anti-Terorisme dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia dan Hukum Pidana Islam: Suatu Studi Perbandingan. Muqaranah, 8(2), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.19109/41e2km10
Arcari, M. (2022). The future of the Articles on State Responsibility: A matter of form or of substance? Questions of International Law, 93, 3–21. https://boa.unimib.it/handle/10281/386742
Bans-Akutey, A., & Tiimub, B. M. (2021). Triangulation in Research. Academia Letters, Article 3392. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL3392
Benvenisti, E., & Cohen, A. (2014). War is Governance: Explaining the Logic of the Laws of War from a Principal-Agent Perspective. Michigan Law Review, 112(8), 1363–1416. https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol112/iss8/1
Born, G. G. (2021). International Arbitration: Cases and Materials (3rd ed.). Kluwer Law International.
Calcara, G. (2021). Balancing International Police Cooperation: INTERPOL and the Undesirable Trade-off Between Rights of Individuals and Global Security. Liverpool Law Review, 42(2), 111–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-020-09266-9
Capus, N., & Gilbert, D. (2024). Intercept evidence from foreign language communications: Reliability and minimum standards in the interests of justice. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 28(4), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127241283662
Chimni, B. S. (2020). The Articles on State Responsibility and the Guiding Principles of Shared Responsibility: A TWAIL Perspective. European Journal of International Law, 31(4), 1211–1221. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chab004
Chowdhury, A., & Shil, N. C. (2021). Thinking ‘Qualitative’ Through a Case Study: Homework for a Researcher. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 5(2), 190–210. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/11280
Chung, E. (2017). The Judicial Enforceability and Legal Effects of Treaty Reservations, Understandings, and Declarations. Yale Law Journal, 126(1), 170–241. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/10265
Connor, R., & Majumdar, R. (2025). Kashmir attack: India downgrades ties with Pakistan (A. Berry (Ed.)). Deutsche Welle. https://www.dw.com/en/kashmir-attack-india-downgrades-ties-with-pakistan/a-72315605
Crawford, J. (2002). The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect. American Journal of International Law, 96(4), 874–890. https://doi.org/10.2307/3070683
Djeffal, C., Siewert, M. B., & Wurster, S. (2022). Role of the state and responsibility in governing artificial intelligence: a comparative analysis of AI strategies. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(11), 1799–1821. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2094987
Fitzmaurice, M. (2002). Third parties and the law of treaties. In J. A. Frowein & R. Wolfrum (Eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nation Law (pp. 37–173). Kluwer Law International. https://doi.org/10.1163/138946302775159433
Fredette, J. (2017). The French State of Emergency. Current History, 116(788), 101–106. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48614240
Gadkari, A. (2023). Does Article IX of the Indus Water Treaty Constitute a Multi-Tiered Arbitration Clause? Cambridge Core Blog. https://www.cambridge.org/core/blog/2023/09/12/does-article-ix-of-the-indus-water-treaty-constitute-a-multi-tiered-arbitration-clause-reflecting-on-the-permanent-court-of-arbitrations-award-on-the-competence-of-the-court-in-the-indus-wat/
Ghose, A., Ali, S. A., & Mohanty, A. (2022). Scope of counterbalancing public policy and execution of foreign arbitral awards in India. Revista Brasileira de Alternative Dispute Resolution, 4(8), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.52028/rbadr.v4i8.6
Greenfield, C., & Das, K. (2025). Pakistan preparing to challenge India’s suspension of water treaty, minister says (R. Gopalakrishnan (Ed.)). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/pakistan-preparing-challenge-indias-suspension-water-treaty-minister-says-2025-04-29
Gunawan, Y., Refisyanti, S. W., Mufida, A., Takarub, K. D., & Nur, A. (2020). Jurisdiction of International Court of Justice (ICJ) Over the Genocide Violations: with Special References to Rohingya Case. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 14(4), 313–336. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no4.1900
Havelka, I. (2024). Interpreting intercepted communication: From talk to evidence. The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 16(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.116201.2024.a02
International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism 1999 (pp. 40–64). (2009). Special Treaty Event April 2009.
Lekkas, S.-I., Merkouris, P., & Peat, D. (2023). The Interpretative Practice of the International Court of Justice. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 26(1), 316–357. https://doi.org/10.1163/18757413_02601015
Lone, F. N. (2020). Damming the Indus Waters: Thoughts on the Future of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty and Himalayan Water Security. Journal of Water Law, 26(5), 207–222. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3683597
Manral, M. S. (2025). Pahalgam terror attack | Terrorists were wearing camouflage outfits, carried M4 carbine, AK-47s, fired 70 rounds: Initial probe. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/india/pahalgam-terror-attack-terrorists-were-wearing-camouflage-outfits-carried-m4-carbine-ak-47s-initial-probe-9959852/
Mao, X. (2022). Public-Interest Litigation before the International Court of Justice: Comment on The Gambia v. Myanmar Case. Chinese Journal of International Law, 21(3), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmac025
McKeever, D. (2021). Revisiting Security Council action on terrorism: New threats; (a lot of) new law; same old problems? Leiden Journal of International Law, 34(2), 441–470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156521000066
McKibben, H. E., & Western, S. D. (2020). ‘Reserved Ratification’: An Analysis of States’ Entry of Reservations Upon Ratification of Human Rights Treaties. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 687–712. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123417000631
Mirumachi, N., & Hurlbert, M. (2022). Reflecting on twenty years of international agreements concerning water governance: insights and key learning. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 22(2), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-022-09564-9
Mitra, E., Ahmad, M., Iyer, A. S., Fox, K., & Yeung, J. (2025). Dozens killed as gunmen massacre tourists in Kashmir beauty spot (C. Nicholls (Ed.)). CNN. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/22/asia/gunmen-open-fire-jammu-kashmir-intl/index.html
Mortenson, J. D. (2013). The Travaux of Travaux: Is the Vienna Convention Hostile to Drafting History? American Journal of International Law, 107(4), 780–882. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.4.0780
Murphy, S. D. (2023). The Heritage of the Articles on State Responsibility for the International Law Commission. In P. G. Teles & P. Bodeau-Livinec (Eds.), Article-by-Article Commentary of the Articles on State Responsibility (pp. 1–16). Oxford University Press. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4412555
Negara, T. A. S. (2023). Normative Legal Research in Indonesia: Its Originis and Approaches. Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.22219/aclj.v4i1.24855
Paparinskis, M. (2020). The Once and Future Law of State Responsibility. American Journal of International Law, 114(4), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2020.60
Permanent Court of Arbitration. (2023). Indus Waters Treaty Neutral Expert Proceedings (India v. Pakistan). Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA). https://pca-cpa.org/cn/cases/297
Plakokefalos, I. (2015). Causation in the Law of State Responsibility and the Problem of Overdetermination: In Search of Clarity. European Journal of International Law, 26(2), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv023
Polgári, E. (2021). The Role of the Vienna Rules in the Interpretation of the ECHR. Erasmus Law Review, 14(2), 82–95. https://doi.org/10.5553/ELR.000193
Qamar, M. U., Azmat, M., & Claps, P. (2019). Pitfalls in transboundary Indus Water Treaty: a perspective to prevent unattended threats to the global security. Npj Clean Water, 2(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-019-0046-x
Qureshi, W. A. (2017). The Indus Waters Treaty and the role of World Bank as mediator. Willamette Journal of International Law and Dispute Resolution, 24(2), 211–232. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26210450
Qureshi, W. A. (2018). Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: An Analysis of the Indus Waters Treaty. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 18(1), 75–116. https://doi.org/https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/drlj/vol18/iss1/4
Rajesh, Y. (2025). India File: A deadly reminder from Kashmir (E. Klamann (Ed.)). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-file-deadly-reminder-kashmir-2025-04-30
Ranjan, A. (2025). Indus Waters Treaty Negotiations: Geopolitics, Disputes and Cooperation. South Asia Research, 45(1), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/02627280241303540
Rizki, R. (2021). Catatan Mengenai Konvensi PBB Anti Kejahatan Transnasional yang Terorganisir dan Protokolnya. Indonesian Journal of International Law, 1(4), 843–852. https://doi.org/10.17304/ijil.vol1.4.569.1
Rossi, C. (2020). Blood, Water, and the Indus Waters Treaty. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 29(2), 105–151. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3510327
Ryngaert, C. (2021). Attributing Conduct in the Law of State Responsibility: Lessons from Dutch Courts Applying the Control Standard in the Context of International Military Operations. Utrecht Journal of International and European Law, 36(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.5334/ujiel.546
Sahrasad, H., Wibisono, A. N., & Al Chaidar, A. C. (2018). Moro Muslims In Southern Phillippines: The Rise of Abu Sayyaf and the Genealogy of Conflict In Southeast Asia. Ulumuna, 22(2), 378–394. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v22i2.340
Seddon, S., & Ewe, K. (2025). India closes main border crossing with Pakistan after Kashmir attack. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8g2njm2d2o
Shaikh, S., & Dashti, A. A. (2022). Indo-Pak Relations in the Light of Mumbai Attacks. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs, 5(2), 1213–1224. https://doi.org/10.52337/pjia.v5i2.505
Shany, Y. (2012). Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: A Goal-Based Approach. American Journal of International Law, 106(2), 225–270. https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.106.2.0225
Singh, S. C., Shahid, A., & Ganguly, S. (2025). What is the Indus Waters Treaty between India and Pakistan? (Y. Rajesh & A. Lewis (Eds.)). Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/what-is-indus-waters-treaty-between-india-pakistan-2025-04-24
Susanto, F. A., Madjid, Y. R., & Saraswati, A. A. A. N. (2024). Ukraine’s submission to the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court: The Rule and Responses. In Proceedings of the 12th UUM International Legal Conference 2023 (UUMILC 2023) (pp. 221–233). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-352-8_17
Tahsin, A., & Wang, E. (2024). The Setting Aside of a “Manifestly Incoherent” Arbitral Award—A Case Note on BZW and BZX v BZV [2022] SGCA. International Arbitration Law Review, 27(1), 70–78. https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85191009321
The Indus Waters Treaty 1960. (1960).
Tin, D., Barten, D. G., Granholm, F., Kovtonyuk, P., Burkle, F. M., & Ciottone, G. R. (2023). Hybrid warfare and counter-terrorism medicine. European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 49(2), 589–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-023-02230-y
United Nations. (1960). No. 6032. The Indus Waters Treaty I960 Between The Government of India, The Government of Pakistan and The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (pp. 126–292).
Vierdag, E. W. (1982). The Law Governing Treaty Relations between Parties to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and States Not Party to the Convention. American Journal of International Law, 76(4), 779–801. https://doi.org/10.2307/2201553
Weißer, B. (2016). Transnational Organised Crime and Terrorism. In P. Hauck & S. Peterke (Eds.), International Law and Transnational Organised Crime (pp. 84–104). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198733737.003.0005
Werle, G. (2007). Individual Criminal Responsibility in Article 25 ICC Statute. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 5(4), 953–975. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqm059
Zvobgo, K., Sandholtz, W., & Mulesky, S. (2020). Reserving Rights: Explaining Human Rights Treaty Reservations. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa070
