Dilemma of Consumer Protection Law Enforcement in E-Commerce in the Grabtoko Case: Who is Responsible?

Authors

  • Deri Darmawan Lubis Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63306/73fgbf16

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Digital Marketplace, E-Commerce, Legal Responsibility, Misleading Advertising

Abstract

This study highlights the dilemma of enforcing consumer protection laws in online marketplaces in the Grabtoko case, which shows a gap between legal norms and their implementation in the field. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effectiveness of consumer protection laws in Indonesia, evaluate the investigation and prosecution processes in the Grabtoko case, and formulate policy recommendations to strengthen criminal law enforcement against misleading advertisements in e-commerce. This research is normative in nature, using a case study and legislation approach. Primary legal materials include the Consumer Protection Law, Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019, the ITE Law, and Decision No. 465/Pid.Sus/2021/PN JKT SEL, while secondary materials consist of law books, journal articles, and official online media reports. The analysis technique used is qualitative, in the form of legal document review and synthesis of legal arguments. The results of the study reveal inconsistencies in the application of norms, particularly in the verification of business actors and the authentication of digital evidence, as well as legal obstacles in proving the element of intent. The four-year prison sentence sets an important precedent, but the proof of subjective mens rea still needs to be strengthened. Recommendations include regulatory revisions, e-KYC certification, digital forensics training, and inter-agency coordination mechanisms to improve the effectiveness of law enforcement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arifin, R., Kambuno, J. A., Waspiah, W., & Latifiani, D. (2021). Protecting the consumer rights in the digital economic era: Future challenges in indonesia. Jambura Law Review, 3, 135–160. https://doi.org/10.33756/jlr.v3i0.9635

Aulia, P., Muklis, M., & Pulungan, R. (2025). Perbandingan perspektif hukum pencegahan kejahatan dunia maya dalam hukum positif dan hukum pidana Islam. Jurnal El-Thawalib, 6(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.24952/el-thawalib.v6i2.14928

Baumann, F., & Rasch, A. (2020). Exposing false advertising. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’économique, 53(3), 1211–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12457

Beecher-Monas, E., & Garcia-Rill, E. (2017). Actus Reus, Mens Rea, and Brain Science: What Do Volition and Intent Really Mean? Kentucky Law Journal, 106(2), 265–314. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/klj/vol106/iss2/5

Bhat, P. I. (2020). Qualitative Legal Research: A Methodological Discourse. In Idea and Methods of Legal Research (pp. 359–382). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199493098.003.0012

Bintarawati, F. (2022). Juridical Analysis of Consumer Protection against Buying and Selling Fraud in the Market Place. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 4(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2022.4.1.10791

Campbell, C., & Grimm, P. E. (2019). The Challenges Native Advertising Poses: Exploring Potential Federal Trade Commission Responses and Identifying Research Needs. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(1), 110–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743915618818576

Covarrubias, J. Z. L., & Covarrubias, I. N. L. (2021). Different types of government and governance in the blockchain. Journal of Governance and Regulation, 10(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.22495/jgrv10i1art1

Defriza, R. (2025). Putusan Arbitrase Tidak Dapat Dieksekusi: Analisis Perbandingan Hukum Arbitrase Indonesia, New York Conention, UNCITRAL, dan SIAC. Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 11(2), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.31599/sasana.v11i2.4719

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

Dzuhriyan, A. R., Permana, S. I., & Gufron, M. K. A. (2025). Consumer Legal Protection in Online Transactions: Challenges and Opportunities in Indonesia’s Digital Economy. Justice Voice, 3(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v3i1.1017

Fahmi, Z., Sangidun, M., Ramadhan, A. F., & Qowima, M. R. (2025). Criminal Law and Islamic Perspectives on The Death Penalty in Parental Murder Cases. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 7(2), 195–214. https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2025.7.2.28829

Fredriksson, T. (2024). Trends in digital trade and e-commerce. United Nations Conference on Trade and Develpoment.

Fricella. S, S. M., & Mamonto, M. A. W. W. (2023). Consumer Protection Against Processed Food Advertisements with Misleading Health Claims. Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation, 3(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.daengku1433

García-Nieto, M. T., Gonzálvez-Vallés, J. E., & Viñarás-Abad, M. (2021). Social Responsibility and Misleading Advertising of Health Products on the Radio. The Opinion of the Professionals. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6912. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136912

Ghozi, A. (2022). The urgency of electronic know your customer (e-KYC): How electronic customer identification works to prevent money laundering in the fintech industry. Diponegoro Law Review, 7(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.7.1.2022.34-52

Irawati, Prananingtyas, P., & Wulan, R. C. (2023). Regulation Urgency of the Misleading “Greenwashing” Marketing Concept in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1270(1), 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1270/1/012007

Issa, H. A. M. B. (2023). Criminal Protection from Misleading Advertisements on Social Media Under the Bahraini Consumer Protection Law. Information Sciences Letters, 12(2), 635–651. https://digitalcommons.aaru.edu.jo/isl/vol12/iss2/10

Jacobsen, J. (2024). Mens Rea. In P. Caeiro, S. Gless, V. Mitsilegas, M. J. Costa, J. di Snaijer, & G. Theodorakakou (Eds.), Elgar Encyclopedia of Crime and Criminal Justice (pp. 555–567). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789902990.mens.rea

Kadir, M. Y. A., Arifin, M., Disantara, F. P., Thuong, M. T. H., & Nutako, B. S. M. (2025). The Reform of Consumer Protection Law: Comparison of Indonesia, Vietnam, and Ghana. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 6(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v6n2.p255-278

Kamran, M., Miru, A., & Maskun, M. (2021). Deception on online selling and buying freud: The law of electronic transaction perspective. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum), 6(2), 270–288. https://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v6i2.304

Khando, K., Islam, M. S., & Gao, S. (2022). The emerging technologies of digital payments and associated challenges: A systematic literature review. Future Internet, 15(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15010021

Kiky, A. (2025). From promises to reality: Analyzing discrepancies in residential property advertisements in indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 28(2), 403–422. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v28i2.13410

Lawrence, A. (2021). Misleading Advertisement and its regulation in the EU Medicine Promotion legal framework. In ScienceOpen Preprints. https://doi.org/10.14293/S2199-1006.1.SOR-.PPQWI00.v1

Lubis, N., Harahap, A. Y., Tantawi, R., Aslami, N., & Sitanggang, T. N. (2024). Dampak perkembangan ekonomi digital terhadap pertumbuhan sektor e-commerce di Indonesia: Perspektif teknologi, konsumen, dan regulasi. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Akuntansi (JENSI), 8(2), 348–259. https://doi.org/10.33059/jensi.v8i2.10649

Mahkamah Agung. (2021). Putusan Nomor 465/Pid.Sus/2021/PN JKT SEL. Mahkamah Agung RI. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/direktori/putusan/zaec16a4457ae142bc90313131323133.html

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi (Cet. 13). Kencana.

Muhammad, N. (2025, August 7). Indonesia’s Internet Penetration Rate to Reach 80% by 2025. Databoks. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/en/technology-telecommunications/statistics/689438c946bef/indonesias-internet-penetration-rate-to-reach-80-by-2025

Mupangavanhu, Y., & Kerchhoff, D. (2023). Online deceptive advertising and consumer protection in South Africa - The law and its shortcomings? De Jure, 56(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.17159/2225-7160/2023/v56a7

Najati, F. A., & Mashdurohatun, A. (2024). The comparative analysis of consumer protection regulations in e-commerce transactions in Indonesia, Singapore and Malaysia. Law Development Journal, 6(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.6.2.200-213

Nannini, L., Bonel, E., Bassi, D., & Maggini, M. J. (2025). Beyond phase-in: assessing impacts on disinformation of the EU Digital Services Act. AI and Ethics, 5(2), 1241–1269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-024-00467-w

Neole, N. G. (2024). Analytical Techniques in Forensic Science. In A. Chaussée & L. J. Leonard (Eds.), Cases on Forensic and Criminological Science for Criminal Detection and Avoidance (pp. 188–240). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-9800-2.ch008

Prawira, M. Y., & Alamsyah, F. (2023). The Implementation of Mutual Legal Assistance between Indonesia and Switzerland Regarding Asset Recovery. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 5(2), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v5i2.17435

Republik Indonesia. (2019). Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 80 Tahun 2019 tentang Perdagangan Melalui Sistem Elektronik.

Rosidah, Z. N., & Karjoko, L. (2025). Enhancing consumer protection in electronic transactions in Indonesia. Sriwijaya Law Review, 9(1), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.Vol9.Iss1.3942.pp194-207

Santoso, T. (2020). Parties to Crime: Development and Comparison. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 2(2), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.2217

Sharma, A., & Kalra, M. (2021). A blockchain based approach for improving transparency and traceability in silk production and marketing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1988(1), 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1988/1/012013

Sitorus, T., Rusmiati, E., & Sulistyani, W. (2025). The Urgency of Regulating Trading in Influence: An Analysis of the Doctrine of Participation in Indonesian Criminal Law. Corruptio, 5(2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.25041/corruptio.v5i2.4025

Subagyono, B. S. A., Romadhona, M. K., Chumaida, Z. V., Suheryadi, B., & Elkhashab, N. S. (2024). Can Indonesia’s Laws Keep Up? Protecting Consumer Rights in Digital Transactions. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(3), 869–890. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.4202

Syaufi, A., Mursidah, M., Zahra, A. F., & Gholi, F. M. I. (2023). Employing forensic techniques in proving and prosecuting cross-border cyber-financial crimes. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 17(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4766606

Taak, S., Tanya, M., & Tanya, M. (2024). “Food” through the Lens of Misleading Advertisements: A Comparative Analysis of India and United States of America. Revista de Direito Internacional, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v21i3.9723

Zard, L., & Sears, A. M. (2023). Targeted advertising and consumer protection law in the European Union. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 56(3), 799–852. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/jbpsm

Downloads

Published

2026-01-05

How to Cite

Lubis, Deri Darmawan. 2026. “Dilemma of Consumer Protection Law Enforcement in E-Commerce in the Grabtoko Case: Who Is Responsible?”. SHISHYA: Studies and Perspectives on Law and Justice 2 (1): 19-27. https://doi.org/10.63306/73fgbf16.